Jump to content

“Love Is Love”


Recommended Posts

Ooh I like that. Mine is "love is love, and just as lovely is lack thereof"

But I feel like "lovely" is the wrong word in that context, so I kind of like your's better.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing inherently wrong with the phrase, however making it the front saying for queer rights was a bad idea, as it does not address trans, intersex, and yes, aro people's issues. I get why it was used though, at least during the early 2000s-2010s, its simple and easy to understand for the average cishet joe who is unfamiliar with the community, and appealed to their basic values. Its also important to remember it was often used for same-sex marriage rights, so I think the problem was less the phrase and more about the fact that many (mainstream) LGBTQ activists tend to hyperfocus on marriage. But anyways, its the 2020's now, so I think it's time we start using other phrases.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@HarvestI would go further and say there is nothing wrong with the phrase at all. It doesn't apply to every persons experience but it doesn't have to. It still applies. I don't think it is really necessary to have a slogan that applies equally to every member of a very broad community. As long as any form of homophobia exists, "Love is Love" belongs at pride. It doesn't necessarily mean we're excluded.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah i've also thought about the fact that it doesn't include queer sexual attraction (even of alloromantics), like the message is that love can't be wrong--well what if it's not love?  some people aren't even ok with straight casual dating/sex so it wouldn't be a big leap for a queer person to feel especially that acceptance depends on them being in a loving relationship.  i suppose "attraction is attraction" doesn't sound as good.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever I think of "love is love" I just think of it also being about how my love for friends, hobbies, etc, is still love and just as important as romantic love.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nix said:

'Love' in tennis means 'nothing'

i have a little decoration which says 'never date a tennis player.  to them, love means nothing.'  me being an aro tennis player, it's a many-layered joke.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was talking about it in another place and yep, it's alienating and not only for aros but also the persons who are part of the LGBTQ+ community but not because of orientation. Also, the phrase even doesn't describe why for real the community was created. How do you want to fight for equality if the only word you know to say is "love"?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen more complaints of the sentence than the sentence itself, though I imagine that's because I'm not that connected to the LGBT+ community to begin with.

I don't particularly like the way it feels defensive to me. As if my worth hinged on "love", and if it isn't romantic, it has to be another form of love. Like, sure, love might've been part of the reason why I consider myself not cis, but alienation from love is just as much a part of my experience.

23 hours ago, aro_elise said:

i suppose "attraction is attraction" doesn't sound as good.

To be fair, I already associate the slogan "attraction is attraction (is attraction)" with the idea that some people don't experience attraction that can be differentiated into multiple types, and that all they feel is "attraction" as one thing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The philosopher Daniel Dennett popularized the term deepity and gave the example: "love is just a word". A deepity is a statement that can be interpreted in two ways: as a trivial truth OR as a profound but false claim.

So is "love is love" a deepity, too? :|

Edited by DeltaAro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really like the term 'love is love' at all, tbh. I think it was necessary when we were fighting for equal marriage rights (or, the right to love the same as straight couples), but outside of that fight, I don't think it's relevant. It was good when we needed to show straight people that we were equal to them, and deserved the same rights as them, but then once we got that, I think we started to outgrow the term. Either way, I don't like the idea of the easily-marketable slogan that companies put on all their stuff during pride month to say they care about us, when really they REALLY REALLY don't.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...