lillia Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 Do we know what kind of peer review (if any?) have shown up about aromanticism and/or its subcategories/microlabels? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P4R4D0X Posted Monday at 02:43 AM Share Posted Monday at 02:43 AM Some things I found: Exploring Aromanticism Through an Online Qualitative Investigation With the Aromantic Community: “Freeing, Alienating, and Utterly Fantastic” “I am not a Robot, I am Asexual”: A Qualitative Critique of Allonormative Discourses of Ace and Aro Folks as Robots, Aliens, Monsters List on AUREA List on Google Scholar List on Tumblr Spreadsheet made by @TripleA This came from a quick Google search, but I hope it helps! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
organs and bone Posted Monday at 12:20 PM Share Posted Monday at 12:20 PM here’s some more! asexual identity development asexuality: what it is and why it matters - fyi in the beginning the author does state that maybe being ace should be a disorder (?) Cognitive processing of sexual cues in asexual individuals and heterosexual women with desire/arousal difficulties loved this one! not quite a study though, but please read c: Who reports absence of sexual attraction in Britain? Evidence from national probability surveys i know of a lot more but hopefully this is good for now. let me know if you want more articles! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lillia Posted Monday at 03:52 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 03:52 PM Will 'deff look into those :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.