It's a big problem - as some of you wrote in the start of this thread - that it is hard to define what a "romantic relationship" really is.
If you look at Wikipedia, the definition is pretty vague:
"Romance is the expressive and pleasurable feeling from an emotional attraction towards another person. This feeling is associated with, but does not necessitate, sexual attraction. For most people it is eros rather than agape, philia, or familial love .
In the context of romantic love relationships, romance usually implies an expression of one's strong romantic love, or one's deep and strong emotional desires to connect with another person intimately or romantically. Historically, the term "romance" originates with the medieval ideal of chivalry as set out in its chivalric romance literature."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romance_(love)
(If someone else have quoted this, please bear with me - I haven't read the whole tread)
In the article on Wikipedia, there are lots and lots of different approaches to the meaning of "Romance" depending on point of view and context.
It is interesting that the idea of "romantic love" originates from the 'courtley love' in 13th - 14th century France.
It was part of the culture and a "Code of Conduct" for the knights, and a token of their passionate devotion and loyalty to a noble wonan .. she was meant to be admired, respected and obeyed, .. but it was most ceartainly not supposed to end up in any sort of physical involvement ...
One might say that "Romantic Love" today also is a "Code of Conduct" in our culture, regarding 'courtship' - and a whole lot of rituals and unspoken social rules as well, of which many seem to date back to the rituals of 'Courtley Love'.
Besides, Romantic Love' today is also an ideal - or almost mandatory - for the emotional life and the relationships of a 'healthy' adult.
What "romantic love" is, is not defined by a complete set of clear rules, but instead communicated through stories, songs, movies, ...
There is a wide spread consensus about what it is (though many people in relationships get in passionate rows about it because the rules aren't so clear after all )
Being aromantic might mean that you somehow don't 'grasp' - or don't fit into - that concensus .. you simply don't really understand something which is self evident to everybody in our culture's mainstream.
I partly agree with the 'rules' of "Roantic Relationships" that SamwiseLovesLife wrote:
.. in particular about the 'being faithful' , 'giving gifts', 'cerimonial to stay together', and that you expect your partner to 'love you more than anyone else' ...
('Kissing on the mouth' and 'kissing with tongue' are in my mind much more sexual and erotic, than it is romantic - but it is included in the romantic norms, an romantic 'fundamentalists' would like it only to take place in a romatic context ...
I think as I am allosexual - and have pretty intense erotic feelings - I could explain some of the romantic emotions and romantic behaviour - they are erotic or sexual, but not necessarily romantic ...
For those of you who a are asexual as well as aromantic, it may be hard to know the difference ...