Jump to content

Nai

Member
  • Content Count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

7 Followers

About Nai

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday July 8

Personal Information

  • Name
    Quen
  • Gender
    girly boy
  • Pronouns
    he/they
  • Location
    deep within the abyss
  • Romanticism
    hella panro
  • Sexuality
    irrelevant

Recent Profile Visitors

2,529 profile views
  1. Well, like, in relationships if you want it to be longterm you have to try and keep it exciting. Some consider certain acts romantic, like buying gifts or going on interesting dates. These things can reignite romantic feelings and keep the relationship going longer. If you're doing the same things or not really doing anything at all, then you'd probably grow bored of the person quickly. But if things keep being interesting, then the attraction can last longer.
  2. Because it feels nice pretty much. Maybe it's kinda like: Why would you eat a cookie if you know you're going to finish it soon? Because I like the taste of cookies. I'm not going to think about what happens after I finish it, but I know that cookies taste good and I'm in the mood for a cookie. From my own experience, that's what I make it out to be at least. Does this make any sense?
  3. Considering I am panromantic and got a 92 on it....yeah. But some of those questions were ridiculous, really. Things like "killing someone for love" and stuff like that.....no, that's not normal, and I would be very afraid of anyone who says that. Being romantic isn't as wild or crazy as that test makes it out to be, for sure.
  4. 17. I'm highly sensitive to touch in particular. I tend to freak out and get major anxiety/paranoia upon being touched without my consent. Nothing traumatic caused this either, so I'm guessing it's just pretty bad social anxiety.
  5. I consider myself gray because I do have a libido, albeit a very low one. I rarely ever masturbate and when I do my arousal dies away before I even get to the "fun part" so I find it very boring and bothersome. As for sex my interest in it is purely curiosity, though I honestly don't care if I die without ever trying it out. If my partner requested it, I wouldn't mind giving it a try. I tend to call myself simply asexual outside of AVEN though. I have more asexual qualities than sexual ones.
  6. I'll jump into this thread too I suppose. I spend more time on AVEN than I do here for...reasons. Agree that AVEN has its issues, but at least it's not as bad as Tumblr. <_<;;
  7. My memory has been getting worse and worse lately. It's a little concerning @_@;;

  8. It's funny, how human nature affects culture and vice versa. No, I think it's natural that many humans seek to share a permanent relationship with another human being. Humans are naturally social creatures that seek life long relationships, which is why I think that romantic and platonic fantasies exist. This natural want is expressed through our culture, and thus the creation of that wonderful....or maybe in some people's cases, not-so-wonderful thing called friendship and romance. So even without culture around I think that people would still find "life mates". It's not just humans. There's a whole bunch of animals that forge life-long relationships. Of course some people do not have this "natural want" in them or it doesn't affect them as greatly, and there's nothing wrong with that. Edit (again): Better link
  9. @Kojote I'm not sure if alloromantic is used the same way as allosexual in Quebec, I'll do some digging later and find that out. As for the content in the spoiler I totally agree, which is why I said it can be argued. That's just an argument I've heard before, but it's literally almost impossible to avoid. That's not the reason why I don't use allosexual. Haha, the same goes for saying "He's sexual". I imagine a guy sprawled out nude on a bed Which is why I thought that "non-aro" might be a good substitute. Or maybe "those outside of/not on the aromantic spectrum", though that's a little lengthy.
  10. Thanks for the responses so far! Looking back at my first post now, maybe my suggestions weren't that great. I just typed the first two that came to my head that didn't bug me as much. I don't mind being called a "romantic", though "romantic person" might work better. I feel like using "a romantic" has some slighty negative connotations to it. For example, the first thing my mind goes to upon reading "a romantic is "a helpless romantic", which....isn't a compliment. I agree with Swanky that using "romantic" and "aromantic" as adjectives is a good approach. Of course, slips of the tongue happen and we all have different preferences to what we like and don't like being called. If another romantic person is fine with being called "alloromantic", then that's alright. For me though, I'd rather not.
  11. New York Also hang out in AVEN's CAPSLOCKIA sometimes, does that count?
×
×
  • Create New...